Re: [ga] ".tel" proposed gTLD, and the like

[Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>]

At 17:32 04/11/2000 -0800, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>using simular logic how do you feel about .GEO or .DIR?
>
>.GEO would never have registrations beloning to another entity, and you
>couldn't transfer registrations. Users would *never* type in a .GEO SLD.

without having read the registration - it sounds about as bad as the pulver 
.tel - if you want to offer a monopoly service for geo location, offer it 
under .yourchoiceofmark.com.


>.DIR A parallel to .COM?

I feel pretty certain that at least one, probably more, of the new TLDs 
will be open TLDs, and thus parallel to .com. I've decided I don't care how 
many .coms there are.



--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html