Fwd: Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

To Harald, Roberto, and all,
during the past days we have had several motions discussed and
seconded but not acted upon. From the following exchange with
Jeff, further to a mail from Harald, I think it is time we respond to
Roberto's proposition. I therefore formaly propose the following
motion which has been already seconded by Jeff to be voted in the
appropriate form chosen by Harald and Roberto. Anyone wanting
to second it too is welcome.

Text of the motion:

   "The Members of the DNSO GA wants the ICANN by laws
     to be modified so the next Chairman of the DNSO/GA ans his
    successors will be elected by the Members of the DNSO/GA."

I am leaving for the day, so I leave it to your care.
Jefsey

>From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
>Jefsey,
>Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > I see you got the humour of my response and responded well
> > to Harald. However I do not think Harald is that much tricky. I
> > think we face a very special situation where much is at stake.
> > I warned Harald and others a few days ago that DNSO could not
> > motion against ICANN. They kept talking (without voting).
>
>Well some discussion is necessary so that other points of view
>are articulated.  But I understand your point and agree with it.
>
> > So I wanted to show them what it really meant. I read Harald's
> > response as a normal call to the order, of which you give the right
> > explanation, to my de facto call of Harald himself to the order
> >
> > The lesson is that we could certainly correct the DNSO errors
> > should we agree together and act as if we could do it. But we
> > will go nowhere as long as we do not concert. Your response
> > show you are in agreement with everyone. Why not to drop the
> > personnal and the historics aspects and go ahead step by step.
>
>Well I not necessarily in agreement with everyone.  But I am
>in agreement that is is log past time to get the DNSO reformed
>and policies changed or new ones established.
>
> > Step one to vote as per the sacro sancto procedure that we
> > want to have the Chair elected by the DNSO GA. And then
> > to build form there.
>
>And I agree with this.  Their also needs to be procedures by which
>the potentially newly ELECTED chair must follow.
>
> > I think than everyone wants with Roberto that the ever moving
> > ICANN by laws be enhanced once more and say that the Chair
> > of the DNSO/GA is to be elected by the Members of the
> > DNSO/GA.
>
>Agreed.
>
> > So will you second the following motion:
>
>Yes, consider it seconded.  Please post this response to the DNSO GA
>list as currently Harald has me SELECTIVELY CENSORED from
>posting.

<Text of the seconded motion :>

> > "The Members of the DNSO GA wants the ICANN by laws
> > to be modified so the next Chairman of the DNSO/GA ans his
> > successors will be elected by the Members of the DNSO/GA."
>
>Agreed.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html