<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[4]: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors
Hello Roeland,
Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 8:55:37 AM, you wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 8:27 AM
>>
>> Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 12:22:51 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> > Sandy,
>>
>> > I think it is a waste of time for the DNSO GA to decide
>> anything about the
>> > composition of the Board. The DNSO should give advice to
>> the Board about
>> > DNSO matters. Of course, we can have an opinion about it,
>> but I think other
>> > channels than the DNSO have to be used if the goal is to change the
>> > composition of the Board.
>>
>> What other channels would you recommend that would have the ability to
>> actually affect it?
> Huh?! Are we talking about the same crowd? The answer is that there are
> zero/none/nada channels.
That was my point, Roeland. He is saying another channel would be
more appropriate, and I wanted to know what channel he thought woudl
be appropriate, because I certainly don't know of one.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|