Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 09:42 7/11/00 -0800, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
>> 1) there is nothing of consequence about an individual
>> constituency that can be accomplished in 10 minutes.
>> Moreover, it overlaps with the DNSO review topic.
>
>There is a possible constructive presentation of this topic. Specifically,
>if there are persons or organizations interested in forming such a
>constituency, they should be given a brief opportunity to address the
>Assembly, announce their intention and solicit participation. Such an
>announcement opportunity should always be open at all GA meetings to any
>group seeking to form a new constituency, regardless of whether it's for
>individuals or something else.
>
>Similarly, once such a group has self-organized, it should be allowed time
>at a GA meeting to present the proposed new constituency, its charter, and
>its proposed membership criteria.
>

Yes. This is the way to go about it. There is overlap with the DNSO review
topic, but an existing constituency that has been  petitioning for
recognition for 18 months, that has a Charter, membership criteria  and
elected representatives should be a key factor in that review.
The Reviewers should be fully aware of all the facts pertaining to it.



--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html