RE: CONSENSUS? [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating rule

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

No.

Chuck Gomes

-----Original Message-----
From: ken@orion.pmiw.com [mailto:ken@orion.pmiw.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 5:50 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: FW: CONSENSUS? [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change
seating rule




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Stoen [mailto:Ken@orion.pmiw.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:09 PM
To: Thomas Roessler; owner-ga@dnso.org
Subject: CONSENSUS? [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating
rule


Hi 
 Let us cut to the chase here.
Consider this a call to the list.

A: Is there a CONSENSUS on the following issue: 



1) The newly elected board members should take
   their seats before the general meeting, not after.


2) All non-elected members whose terms have been
   extended beyond their original time should immediately
   resign. 


Please reply with yes "I agree"  or "I don't agree"


Ken


>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Thomas
>Roessler
>Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:05 AM
>To: William X. Walsh
>Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'technizmo'; ga@dnso.org
>Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating rule
>
>
>On 2000-11-10 05:52:44 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> Participation is the responsibility of the participant.
>> Registering or not registering your vote is not our
>> responsibility.
>
>While this is true, it won't work on mailing lists in general.  If
>all you want to do is claim rough consensus, post a message with a
>clear and visible subject, like:
>
>	CONSENSUS?  <topic>
>
>and give people two or three days to indicate their possible
>objections.  Normally, you'll quite quickly see whether or not there
>are strong objections against claiming consensus.  This can also be
>documented.
>
>While, this way, you won't get strong documentation and clear
>legitimation like with formal votes, it'll be sufficient in
>situations where time is insufficient for a vote, and at least a
>rough result should be produced.
>
>-- 
>Thomas Roessler                         <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html