<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh
It is undoubtedly within Harald's discretion to make this finding.
Nevertheless, I do not find it a reasonable decision, and I'm very
uncomfortable with it.
I hold Joop in the highest esteem, and I usually admire Harald's reasoning.
Nevertheless, William's remark was a simple fact. If a list is not public,
no one else can verify its validity.
Dennis Schaefer
Marblehead, MA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
To: <dassa@dhs.org>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh
> At 21:22 15/11/00 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>
> >I am also very surprised the complaint was lodged over such a
> >paragraph. I have seen both Joop and WXW indulge in more heated
> >discussions, together and with others. I have also seen worse on this
> >list from others.
>
> This surprised me too. The paragraph was chosen by the monitor out of two
> sentences that demonstrated a pattern of personal attacks.
> You see how difficult it is to be a judge and jury at the same time.
>
> An offlist vote offloads this burden from the moderator's shoulders.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|