<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Appeal of William Walsh
Hi Roberto
Quite right, thank you. I'd support you on this one. You aid:
> Anyway, I believe that the sanction against William Walsh was too severe
> , given the facts. May I therefore ask the DNSO Admin to reintegrate the
> posting rights of Mr. Walsh.
Nobody wants to overturn the moderator but in this particular instance perhaps
Harald will reconsider and give William another chance.
Providing the debate about IDNO is not prolonged interminably.
Without taking sides between the participants, I'd add that it has also been
aired extensively in other forums.
Best regards
Patrick Corliss
----- Original Message -----
From: Roberto Gaetano <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:50 AM
Subject: [ga] Appeal of William Walsh
> Hi.
>
> I was finally able to go over the messages accumulated in some 20 days
> when I was on the road. I have to apologize for the late reply, but the
> matter was worse due to the fact that I was unable to access the ga-
> abuse until this morning.
>
> Anyway, I believe that the sanction against William Walsh was too severe
> , given the facts. May I therefore ask the DNSO Admin to reintegrate the
> posting rights of Mr. Walsh.
>
> I must add, nevertheless, that I am sick and tired of this continuous
> polemics between William and Joop. I think that by now everybody on this
> list has abundantly understood the reasons of both, and nothing can be
> added of value: to re-hash these arguments has the only effect to drive
> away some readers of this list, or at least lower their interest.
>
> I would therefore appreciate in the future avoiding bringing in the GA
> the internal matter of the IDNO, and this not for fear of sanctions, but
> because, as I said, everybody knows by now what happened, and the
> opinions of all the participants, and I doubt that there is willingness
> to hear this subject over again.
>
> We have many other things before us, including:
> - to open a mailing list dedicated to the Individuals, as mentioned in
> MdR, where we may be able to convey, with the help of Barbara Simons and
> other interested parties, some of the individuals that are AtLarge
> members, if they are interested in the DNSO;
> - start the DNSO Review Working Group;
> - actualize and finalize the discussion on funding for the GA physical
> meeting Webcast.
> We also have to prepare the new elections, to decide what to do next for
> the ICANN Interim Directors extension (I believe the poll has been
> counted already electronically - manual recount is ongoing).
>
> So, plenty of things that may be of more interest than the old stuff.
>
> Regards
> Roberto
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|