Re: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh

["Dennis Schaefer" <apsdps@mediaone.net>]

Joop

Sorry for the delay in responding ...

You are missing the point, in my opinion.   William's
complaint is that the list does not permit public
validation.

That allegation is not only a matter of fact, it is one
not worth fighting over.


>Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
To: "Dennis Schaefer" <apsdps@mediaone.net>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh


> At 19:10 15/11/00 -0500, Dennis Schaefer wrote:
> >It is undoubtedly within Harald's discretion to make this finding.
> >
> >Nevertheless, I do not find it a reasonable decision, and I'm very
> >uncomfortable with it.
> >
> >I hold Joop in the highest esteem, and I usually admire Harald's
reasoning.
> >Nevertheless, William's remark was a simple fact.   If a list is not
public,
> >no one else can verify its validity.
>
> Dennis,
> the list of IDNO members *is* public and it truthfully lists new signups
in
> chronological sequence.  Many new members provide links to their websites.
> See www.idno.org/members.htm
>
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html