Re[2]: Fw: [ga] Re: [voters] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 09:47 PM 11/29/00, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Hello Joop,
>
>Wednesday, November 29, 2000, 4:48:56 PM, you wrote:
>
> > The danger here is, that the (probably endless) discussions in such a WG
> > would just provide the excuse to the Board to further postpone any decision
> > on the petition of the IDNO constituency that has been in sitting there
> > for over a year.
>
>My understanding is that the call is for a WG on the formation of an
>individual's constituency, not on the IDNO petition to have itself
>declared a constituency.

That is completely correct. And it is a call for a GA working group, NOT a 
DNSO working group, and not an NC working group.

Regards,
Greg

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html