Re: [ga] Re: NCDNHC supported an individual domain name holders constituency in principle

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

I am sorry, David, but I am afraid is it responsible to tell that spelling 
the truth is an irresponsible statement? Vany was on the spot. She quotes 
her references. She explains that according to the then prevailing rules 
the motion is valid. She copies the concerned constituency list only for 
the records. I know I ignore the internal problems that the NCDNHC may 
encounter on that matter, but the reasonable way to address that statement, 
seen from outside would,
- either be to demonstrate (not just use big words) that Vany made an error
- or to have an NCDNHC vote in order to confirm or to change that position 
today, as according to the records NCDNHC supported - clverly on my opinion 
- the representation of the individual domain name owners within the DNSO.
Vany, I thank you for your contribution which is most probably of real 
interest for most of the Members of the GA.
Jefsey Morfin


On 19:45 16/12/00, Vany Martinez said:
>David Wasley:
>
>You wasn't in Chile, the rules was different than now, and the resolution 
>was made in that way,.  If you want to verify this,  you just have to 
>listen the Real Audio Archive.
>
>I am saying the thruth, I was there, you wasn't and you wasn't member of 
>the constituency by that time as far as I know, David Wasley.
>
>NCDNHC made that resolution in that way....you cannot change the 
>resolution NCDNHC made.
>
>And I am not being irresponsible.   I am saying the things that happened 
>in Santiago Meeting.    I am a rresponsible person that I cannot stand in 
>silence seeing that a person
>is called lier when I know what is the thruth.  And also is in audio 
>records in Real Audio format.
>
>And as I said, I sent this as a CC to the NCDNHC mailing list for the 
>records only.   If you has anything to say, say it in the GA list.
>
>Vany
>
>At 09:23 a.m. 12/16/00 -0800, you wrote:
>>Vany,  This sort of irresponsible statement is precisely what generated 
>>the last month of heated discussion on this list.  You have only reopened 
>>the wound and poured salt into it.
>>
>>You state that the GA should believe, as a result of a face-to-face 
>>meeting in Chile, that:
>>     "The NCDNHC supports in principle that Individual Domain Name Holders
>>      be represented in the DNSO as a separate constituency."
>>
>>This is not a true statement.  As we have discussed for many weeks now, 
>>it may represent a virtuous position but it is not a position ratified by 
>>the NCDNHC constituency.  It is a position endorsed (I assume) by the 
>>members of NCDNHC attending that meeting in Chile.  It must be 
>>represented as such specifically, not merely by inference.
>>
>>Based on the context you provided, I infer that the statement should read:
>>     "_xx_ members of the NCDNHC, meeting in Santiago de Chile on August 24,
>>      2000, supported in principle that Individual Domain Name Holders be
>>      represented in the DNSO as a separate constituency."
>>
>>This distinction might seem unimportant at the moment but it is this sort 
>>of erosion that leads to misunderstanding later.
>>
>>         David Wasley
>>         Not at the meeting in Chile
>>-----
>>At 10:15 AM -0500 on 12/16/00, Vany Martinez wrote:
>>
>>>Dear GA members:
>>>
>>>I am delegate of SDNP/Panama to the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders 
>>>Consituency and I attended Santiago de Chile meeting in August 1999.
>>>
>>>As a member and attendant of such meeting (but not in behalf of the 
>>>NCDNHC) I want to confirm that the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders 
>>>Constituency, at Santiago de Chile meeting on August 24, made the 
>>>following resolution:
>>>
>>>"The NCDNHC supports in principle that Individual Domain Name Holders be 
>>>represented in the DNSO as a separate constituency."
>>>
>>>This resolution can be heard, for those who are interested in verify 
>>>this statement, at the following URL:
>>>
>>>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/scripts/rammaker.asp?s=cyber&dir=icann&file=dnso-ncdnhc-082499&start=5&end=1-03-00
>>>
>>>This is the record in Real Audio of the whole meeting of NCDNHC at 
>>>August 24.
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, there's no written minutes available, as far as I 
>>>know.   If anyone has minutes of such meeting, please let me know in 
>>>order to include them in our webpage.
>>>
>>>If anyone have any questions, comments or just serve as a witness 
>>>confirming what I stated here, please don't hesistate in do it.
>>>
>>>I am sending a CC of this message to the NCDNHC list, just for the records.
>>>
>>>Best Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
>>>IT Specialist
>>>Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
>>>e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
>>>Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
>>>Fax: (507) 230-3646
>>>
>>>---
>>>You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: david.wasley@ucop.edu
>>>To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
>>>leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1744X@lyris.isoc.org
>
>Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
>IT Specialist
>Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
>e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
>Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
>Fax: (507) 230-3646
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html