Re: [ga] Re: NCDNHC supported an individual domain name holders constituency in principle

[Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>]

At 05:42 PM 12/16/00 -0500, Vany Martinez wrote:
>Neither were rules that stated that resolutions made in f2f wasn't 
>representative of the entire NCDNHC.

Dear GA,

I am sitting in my car, alone, waiting for a train to arrive in San 
Francisco.  I am a member of the NCDNHC and have just held an impromptu 
meeting of the NCDNHC.  It is the unanimous consensus of this meeting to 
disband the NCDNHC.

There are no NCDNHC rules prohibiting such meetings or resolutions, so I 
will rely on Sr. Martinez' above statements as authorization for this 
constituency decision.

d/


=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html