RE: [ga] status of the GA

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Greg Burton [mailto:sidna@feedwriter.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:04 AM

> >What would you conclude if not that there is not a great 
> interest in the 
> >matter?
> 
> I would conclude that the GA is ill-defined, has no mandate 
> to do anything, 
> and that the NC has neglected it's duties to "manage the 
> consensus-building 
> process" in regards to the GA specifically.

Agreed.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html