<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Call for focus.....
At 09:13 AM 2/4/01, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>At 23:40 02/02/2001 -0700, Greg Burton wrote:
>>If we do that, can we have nominees ready for the NC by the 26th? It
>>would be good to have something for them by then, if they're planning to
>>address the situation at the teleconference.
>
>I would think that we would need longer.
>For instance 2 weeks for nominations & acceptance, and 1 week for an
>opinion poll (aka "vote"). That makes 3 weeks. Still possible, if we start
>earlier.
Ok - it looks to me like we'd need to start on the 6th, if we allowed 10
days for nomination and acceptance, and 7 days for the poll. This would
close on the 23rd, then, and give the NC at least a couple of days to look
over what we've done.
I share your concern and desire to see the GA members comment on the task
force report, and personally would like to see more discussion of Bret's
ideas for the coming year as part of that. If we focus on those two things
- task force report comments and nominations - I think we could handle both.
What does everyone think?
Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|