RE: [ga] Old proposal

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

It sounds like all ICANN constituencies should have .INT domain names...

NCC.INT, BIZ.INT, ISPCP.INT  CCTLD.INT  IP.INT  ETC.INT

peter

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Kent
Crispin
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:06 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Old proposal


On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:48:30PM -0500, Sandy Harris wrote:
> I recently had occasion to look at RFC 920
> http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/rfc/rfc0920.txt
> |      Multiorganizations
> |
> |         A multiorganization may be a top level domain if it is large,
> |         and is composed of other organizations; particularly if the
> |         multiorganization can not be easily classified into one of the
> |         categories and is international in scope.
>
> My question is whether we should resurrect the "multiorganisation"
category.
> If there are international organisations meeting the criteria (and my
guess
> would be there are), give them all TLDs now.

I believe that became "subdomains of .int".

--
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html