<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] Old proposal
Hello Marilyn,
Tuesday, February 06, 2001, 8:16:55 AM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Peter, as you know, ICANN isn't a UN treaty organization.
Neither is tpc.int.
> I'm not sure why
> this would be a useful suggestion for other reasons, as well. It would also
> seem to imply a governmental relationship. Not, in our view as industry, a
> useful thing.
I don't see any correlation between presence in .int and a
governmental relationship (see previous example).
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|