Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 18:56 8/02/01 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>Jefsey,
>>
>>Thank you Harald for this.
>>May be could you update us on what is pending and we should vote on?
>
>
>The question Harald was referring to is the following.
>The GA has voted (majority vote) in Marina del Rey for a direct election of 
>the GA Chairman. This implies a change in the ICANN bylaws.
>My idea, as written a couple of times to the GA, is that a formal motion on 
>the list with a formal vote (on the list) will have more strength, and the 
>motion transmitted to the Board will have more weight.
>
>So Harald was hoping to see a debate on this, and then a motion to vote.
>
>By the way, it is still not too late ;>)
>
A motion has been made by Joanna Lane (seconded) about the method to be
followed for nominations. (same as for the WG-review Chair election).

All the Chair needs to do it to acknowledge the motion and ask that the
process be started accordingly.




--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html