Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

I prompt the following motion to the Chair:

"
The DNSO/GA wants to directly elect its Chairman. This requires a change in 
the iCANN bylaws. It therefore request the NC:
- to address that issue with the Board at the earliest convenience.
- in the meanwhile to commit to the DNSO/GA that they will elect as a Chair 
the person selected by the DNSO/GA.
"

Jefsey


On 17:56 08/02/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Jefsey,
>>
>>Thank you Harald for this.
>>May be could you update us on what is pending and we should vote on?
>
>
>The question Harald was referring to is the following.
>The GA has voted (majority vote) in Marina del Rey for a direct election 
>of the GA Chairman. This implies a change in the ICANN bylaws.
>My idea, as written a couple of times to the GA, is that a formal motion 
>on the list with a formal vote (on the list) will have more strength, and 
>the motion transmitted to the Board will have more weight.
>
>So Harald was hoping to see a debate on this, and then a motion to vote.
>
>By the way, it is still not too late ;>)
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html