Re[2]: [ga] Reform in the GA?

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Eric,

Friday, February 09, 2001, 10:28:50 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:

> (i)(B) The Board may, with concurrence of a majority of all of its members,
> whether voting or not, remove the Chair of the General Assembly for good
> cause shown. (the argument was we could have a wing nut as chair. How does it
> follow the NC decides when a Chair needs to be removed? When they question the
> NC? (Yikes whether voting or not?????) That is carte Blanche.

Whether voting or not sets a higher standard than most decisions made
by the board.  It requires an actual majority of the full complement,
not just a majority of a quorum.  It is typical in major decisions
like this to require a higher standard to prevent abuse of it.
Perhaps now that you understand it better, you will see your criticism
of it was just a little off base.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html