<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] New TLD Agreements
WXW, Michael and all remaining assembly members,
I must also agree with William on this one. The UDRP is an abomination
of gargantuan purporting. It is extra-legal, it thwarts due process, it
has less and less support on a global basis by stakeholders. The
evidence
is simply overwhelming. The UDRP should be suspended until reforms
are incorporated or done away with all together.
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 6:29:29 PM, Michael F. McNulty wrote:
>
> > The UDRP has saved legitimate businessess many, many
> > millions of dollars in legal fees. ICANN has justified itself
> > by this mechanism alone.
>
> Yes, it saved them much in legal fees to win cases that they would
> never have won had they gone to court.
>
> They've enabled businesses to reverse hijack and seize domain names
> that they would have absolutely NO right to under the law.
>
> ICANN has done more damage to its credibility with the UDRP than with
> any single other act.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|