<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: More ICANN "Transparency"
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] Re: More ICANN "Transparency"
- From: David Farrar <david@farrar.com>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 15:12:11 +1300
- In-Reply-To: <20010302074159.B30650@songbird.com>
- Organization: Doing Well
- References: <p05010422b6c4b1a6338a@[206.132.89.194]>; <20010301185033.I23890@songbird.com> <3A9F1112.28057.1FED47E@localhost> <20010302074159.B30650@songbird.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:41:59 -0800, you wrote:
>Apparently Verisign approached ICANN with this proposal; the ICANN staff
>nailed down the details; ICANN put the proposal out for public comment.
>I know that people would love to sit here and wallow in conspiracy
>theories, but this is not a done deal; the board hasn't voted on it, and
>I'm quite sure that they haven't made up their mind to accept it or
>reject it -- there are lots of REAL questions here:
The Board should not vote on it (at this stage). They should follow
the bylaws and refer it to the DNSO for a recommendation - at least on
the policy issues involved.
DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|