<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various forums, we can ask substantive questions
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, March 06, 2001, 11:57:30 AM, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> I agree with Roberto that discussion related to the chair election
> and the DNSO review should be the GA's top priorities for Melbourne. Given
> the discussion that has taken place on the list already, those are the
> issues on which it will be both possible and useful to generate a GA "sense
> of the room" in advance of the NC meeting and the Board's public
> forum. There's no time in Melbourne for the GA to do meaningful work on
> the issues raised by the proposed new TLD and Verisign contracts.
The GA Chair election really isn't much of a subject of discussion for
a face 2 face meeting, since a nomination and election process is
already underway and has started.
What is there possibly to discuss that would justify taking time away
from other more important issues?
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|