RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Chuck,
>
>In my own opinion as I have expressed individually and in public meetings
>here in Melbourne, Dave is correct in his conclusion that the real choices
>are between the two agreements.  For those that insist this is a
>policy/process issue, is 30 days not an adequate amount of time for review
>and comment?


No, it is not, and to see how much time decision of lesser importance have 
taken should show us this.

Nevertheless, we have to cope with externally imposed constraint, and 
therefore we have to make the better possible decision with the little time 
we have.

Of course, there is the risk of taking the wrong decision, but that was 
known to the parties that negotiated the deal, I assume.
What I would like to add is that in case of doubt it is obvious that the 
"statu quo" shall be preserved.
The question is therefore: can the proposers of the change convince us of 
the benefits of this change for the Internet community beyond doubt, such as 
the DNSO can recommend a change in the current policy (or at least in the 
consolidated practice shown in all the consistent decisions so far)? And can 
this be done in the short timeframe that the contracting parties have chosen 
to adopt?

Regards
Roberto

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html