RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 3:12 pm -0500 3/13/01, vint cerf wrote:
>Roberto,
>
>you have the right question: is the new proposal any better than the default?
>
>As to the time frame, it is not entirely of our choosing. ICANN and VeriSign
>began discussing an alternative to the current contract language rather late
>in the game and the various deadlines dictate the time we have to make the
>choice.

1. Verisign started negotiations late, because that suited its purpose.

2. Verisign is refusing to extend the original contract, because that suits
its purpose.

3. ICANN's answer should be "you waited too long, so the original contract
stands".

End of story.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html