<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] .ORG Names
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: Re: [ga] .ORG Names
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:06:53 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103150030560.47357-100000@pan.bijt.net>; from Marc Schneiders on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:33:27AM +0100
- Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
- References: <20010314142822.A11923@songbird.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103150030560.47357-100000@pan.bijt.net>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:33:27AM +0100, Marc Schneiders wrote:
[...]
> > I believe that the document was prepared in a tremendous last-minute
> > rush), but the fact is that the legal documents themselves contain
> > absolutely no presumption about how .org should be managed.
>
> It would be great and very helpful for the further discussion, if
> ICANN would send out something reassuring about this. Say a *clear*
> message from the chairman?
The discussion on the names council list from Touton and Sims is very
clear indeed.
More important, "assurances" are a red herring and a rathole and a
crutch. What matters is what's in the documents.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|