Re[2]: [ga] Re: Board descisions

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Dave,

Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 8:56:51 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

> At 06:58 PM 3/14/2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>>No "inventive interpretation" is necessary. All that is required is to
>>read the letter from NSI.

> Ignoring entirely the matter of precise wording, since when does an NSI 
> letter dictate an ICANN decision?

> d/

> ps.  In any event it would be far more productive to focus on the actual 
> terms and conditions of the proposed changes for NSI, rather than being 
> distracted by decisions that would be made later and not by NSI.

So when are you going to do that. Most of us have been doing that, and
find the terms lacking.

So I ask you for the third time, and the second time just this
evening, what do you find in this agreement that makes it preferable
over the existing one, and how do you see those benefits overweighing
the drawbacks that have been addressed here (And ignored by you) ?

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html