ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA Straw Poll


GA members,

Please continue expressing your preference on the question raised by Bruce: this straw poll has the endorsement of the Chair, as requested by Dave (see below).

As I started already counting, those who have already answered need not repeat the "show of hand". Of course, it will be good if others are counting as well, just in case I miss somebody.

Regards

Roberto

P.S.: I still think that this exercise has to be complemented by a document that explains the reasons for the choice - I am also keeping track of the argumentations so far, and will try to summarize sometimes next week.

>From: Bruce James
>Reply-To: Bruce James
>To: "[GA]" , Geurs Dave-xdat11
>Subject: [ga] GA Straw Poll
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:10:49 -0600
>
>I will always defer to the Chair.
>
>I now call for the Chair to conduct a "Straw Poll", and save us all a lot of
>time.
>
>I am sorry you do not like a "Straw Poll". I have found it VERY useful in
>finding how everyone feels on a given "vote" to come, AND does save a great
>deal of time for all involved.
>
>I sit on 5 Boards and we do this quite often.
>
>/Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Geurs Dave-xdat11"
>To: "'Bruce James'" ; "'[GA]'"
>Cc: "Geurs Dave-xdat11"
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:39 AM
>Subject: RE: [ga] GA Straw Poll
>
>
>Bruce,
>
>I do not believe in "straw polls" called by people other than the chair. If
>you want to have a straw poll, put it up to the chair. Otherwise it is a
>wasted execise. The chair is there to do these things. Use the structure.
>
>Dave
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce James [mailto:bmjames@swbell.net]
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:32 AM
>To: [GA]
>Subject: [ga] GA Straw Poll
>
>
>Thank you all for your input to our "Straw Poll".
>
>I would like remind everyone that a "Straw Poll" is just that.....
>
> A non-binding feel of the GA and its view of the new contract.
>
> So far all of the "votes" have been "for" keeping the current contract
>in place.
>
>I welcome more "votes" either way:
>
> 1.) Keep the current VeriSign contract.
>
> 2.) Agree to the new VeriSign contract.
>
>
>/Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dassa"
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 6:39 AM
>Subject: RE: [ga] straw poll
>
>
>I have already stated my position on the contract and given one of the
>reasons
>for my thinking. I will most likely contribute other reasons as the
>discussion
>progresses. In the Meantime:
>
>I vote for retaining the existing contract.
>
>Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-- This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>