<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions
Dear Chuck,
thank you for this confirmation.
Obviously dates would be of real interest to put the different events
into perspective.
On 00:13 19/03/01, Gomes, Chuck said:
>My understanding is as follows and as I recall Joe Sims confirmed much of
>this in Melbourne: VeriSign approached ICANN about the possibility of
>renegotiating the agreements and proposed the $200M investment idea. At
>first, this seemed to be an unrealistic idea so VeriSign continued pursuing
>the separation of its Registrar business. Later, some interest was
>communicated by ICANN and they then proposed the terms of the new
>agreements. Detailed negotiations of those terms then ensued.
Kent spoke of an endowment into the iCANN: could you comment in this?
>I do not know specific time frames of the above, but I can tell you that
>within VeriSign there was not much optimism about the possibility of
>renegotiating until very late in the game, well into 2001.
So why the take-it or leav-it ultimatum.
Jefsey
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|