<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions
Roberto,
I understand and in fact we have been trying to do this for over six months
with little success. I was simply responding to the questions asked.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:ga_chair@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:45 AM
To: cgomes@verisign.com; terastra@terabytz.co.nz; ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions
Chuck,
>3. There have been areas in the existing agreement where there is
>sufficient
>ambiguity that it has made it difficult to take action. A recent example
>of
>this relates to the Multilingual Testbed. We have been unable to take
>certain actions that I believe would have been very beneficial to the
>community at large because of disagreements between us and ICANN regarding
>current contractual language. I think we could have avoided many
>complaints
>especially from the Asia Pacific region if the agreement was more specific.
I believe that, if there is the need to improve or better clarifie some
specific points in the current contract, this can be achieved just by
agreement of the parties without necessarily changing at the same time the
decision about separation between Registry and Registrar.
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|