[ga] Re: [icann-eu] Re: Proposed statement on Verisign contract revision

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Jeff Williams points out the two missing points:

On 02:32 20/03/01, Jeff Williams said:
>Milton and all,
>#10 looks very good as stated.  Well done Milton!
>Now for some additional amendments or clauses that might be or some
>interest with respect to the $200m and the $5m.... Any ideas on how
>these funds should be handled and also utilized?

1. it should be stated that the non profit organization will be publicly 
set-up or selected as per rules established by the BoD after discussion at 
the DNSO. It should also be stated that VeriSIgn will handle the M$ 5 to 
the selected/publicly set-up .org managing non-profit and not the iCANN.

2. that the M$ 200 will be used in addition to the normal investement of 
VeriSign and according to a budget to be reviewed by the concerned parties 
(DNSO, PSO, ASO, Registrars, @large) and publicly agreed by the BoD. And 
that it will serve to open competition and that developped softwares will 
be under the GNU licence.

Jefsey



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html