Re: [ga] Option A -- "Divestiture'

[Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>]

    This argument in my non-humble opinion has us right on track with what we
should be worrying about -- methodology.  Mr. Touton should answer this directly.
The staff is being misused to replace the GA the IDNHO and the ALMs.  These are
brilliant young men who deserve our admiration.  No one deserves to be put in this
position, yet Mr. Touton has seen fit to commit to this course of action.  I beg
our corporate representative to give us a humble opinion.  (in case that is too
hard for the ivory school chaps, what I mean is, Mr Touton weigh in or back out!)
And do pardon any innapropriate participles.  You do seem to be hiding behind your
employees.

And now I am regretably placed in this position.  But here lies the core of our
issues when unobstructed by obstructionists.

Sincerely,

DPF wrote:

> For someone like me who is pretty conservative on most issues to be
> appalled by what I observe the staff doing should be ringing warning
> bells to those who care.  I have absolutely no commercial interest in
> the Internet or ICANN and am purely concerned with what is best for
> the Internet (as I am sure others are).  And I am very very concerned
> about the attempt to bulldoze these new agreements through as the
> effects could be with us for decades.  They also have the potential to
> permanently destroy faith in ICANN's ability to succeed.
>
> DPF
> --

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html