Re: [ga] ORG: some answers from ICANN

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

"Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" wrote:
> 
> Is there really a need to be so....negative about an individual > posting I've made? I do take offense to the assertion that my postings > are about corporate greed. 

Marilyn, please don't take that tack with me. 
Frankly, I'm offended that you'd even attempt to
reduce this to a personal issue, but... I'm not
surprised. It's not personal Marilyn... it's about
business, and you do represent certain interests
<period>.  My soccer coach once told me to "always
watch the ball, never the person... always follow
the ball!" Well Marilyn, I'm following the ball
and not you.  Heck, if it weren't you personally,
it would just be somebody else...  So please,
don't be offended. 

> I spend a lot of time on the list, and do it, often, as you do, at    > the expense of other business interests, because i think this is    > important.

Marilyn, let's be honest, you're not here because
you enjoy being here... you're not here because
you'd rather do this than spend time with your
family/loved one(s).  You are here as a Business
Constituency representative via your position at
AT&T, and also as a Names Council Member.  Of a
certainty, you always carefully consider what you
write to the List in light of your position(s). 
Probably, about the the only thing you don't weigh
carefully in this regard is the font you choose to
type in.  Now, all this aside, are you going to
answer the question posed by William Walsh or not?
==================
> Michael, that's the critique. Where's the "here's what i can do to
> contribute to a solution?" Or do you only critique? 

> and if that is the case, then who offers solutions?

This presumes that there is a problem that needs a
solution.

What exactly is the problem, Marilyn?
==================
It's been a couple hours since William asked his
question, yet you have chosen to respond to other
posts in the interim.  This reminds me of certain
other questions you have evaded, such as Joop's
recurring question of "creating a super Name
Holders constituency (9 seats), to be balanced by
an ISP/IP/registrar/registry industry (9 seats)
with an elected Chair as casting vote."  A
question he's repeated often enough in the past
few months (since January!).  In fact, you have
not even acknowledged it.

> I don't appreciate at all your last posting. It is also rather
> unprofessional... which isn't really like you at all.

Well, to be honest, I don't appreciate a lot of
things people do... like ignoring questions.  I
think it's very unprofessional for someone to
ignore legitimate questions and evade issues,
especially on such important matters, and most
especially when they are in positions of power and
responsibility.  That's my opinion, and I believe
I'm entitled to it.  In the GA, I'm just another
unrepresented individual who's incensed at what is
going on (and our numbers are growing).

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
	sans affiliation
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html