Re[2]: [ga] Contract Verisign / ICANN and statuschange of dot org from unrestricted to restricted

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Kent,

Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 7:56:19 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
>> The statements in the faq may have no legal force. But must
>> we assume that they are meaningless?

> What are you talking about? The statements in the FAQ explicitly state
> that *any* change to policies in .org would only come through community
> consensus. 

AFTER stating that a decision had ALREADY been made about the type of
entity that will manage it, and using the "possibility" of such a
restriction as a basis for it.

This is so plain as to be blatantly obvious. To everyone but someone
like yourself and Dave Crocker, who, for some odd reason, agree and
defend every single action of ICANN's, and never find themselves in
any disagreement with, or critical of any action or proposed action.

Your credibility (or lack thereof) when discussing ICANN policy
matters is clear.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html