<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: ICANN as a Governing Body
At 12:02 29/03/2001 -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>I might submit that the ORSC has proven themselves much better at that game.
>One of the first steps is to acknowlege, without reservation, that an
>outside world exists. The failure of the ICANN, to take this crucial step,
>is a large part of what presented new.net with their market opportunity. Had
>ICANN incorporated ORSC principles, as they agreed to in 1998, new.net might
>not even exist. The systematic disenfranchisement, of those working in the
>other root-zones, is a large part of the problem. It presented the
>market-gap that new.net is moving to fill.
OTOH, one could argue that ICANN has been successful in gathering the
interest, and sometimes even the support (albeit never warm, and with much
argument and maneuvring), of the world's governments, Internet service
provicers, Internet commercial organizations and even some Internet users -
something ORSC has spectacularly failed to do.
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|