ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Names Council vote


Dave, I do not understand if you are meaning sarcasm, criticism, or support
of my position.

Please clarify.

peter

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Dave
Crocker
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:00 PM
To: Peter de Blanc
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Names Council vote


At 05:38 PM 3/29/2001, Peter de Blanc wrote:
>Under the current contract, the contributions to ICANN from VeriSign/NetSol
>are capped at $ 250,000 for the registry and $ 2 million for the registrar.
>As the iCANN budget increases, (which it will), and the number of
>registrations in .com increase, this has the effect of reducing the cost
per
>name to VeriSign, while INCREASING the contribution and cost per name of
>ccTLD registries.

Peter,

You seem to think that looking at real and practical differences between
the old-vs-new contracts is somehow relevant.

Shame on you.  You should know better than to try to inject serious
analysis into the fray.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>