Re: [ga] Endorsement of Patrick Corliss

[Weisberg <weisberg@texoma.net>]

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> I consider that self-endorsement is essentially meaningless and should be taken
> as self-evident.

It is certainly redundant, given the candidate's prior acceptance.  Fortunately, it
was also unnecessary under the GA rules, as Patrick had 5 prior endorsements at the
time, and qualified for the GA ballot.  And, he now has more than the 10 "needed" to
qualify under the presumed NC rules for its consideration.

Thus,  his comments are only a reminder that this issue needs to be revisited after
the (s)election.



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html