<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] And I agree with Eric [Was: I agree with everything Roberto (and Harald) said]
Eric Weisberg wrote:
>
>I am going to endorse all the candidates and suggest that others wishing to
>moot
>this issue do so as well.
>
One thing I would like to add, joining Eric in inviting people to endorse
the candidates that did not pass yet the cap.
The rule was intended initially to avoid crowding the list intended to be
passed to the NC with a large number of irrelevant (or even non-existing,
for who remembers "the way we were" in 1999) candidates.
The purpose was to pass to NC a reasonably-sized list.
With only four candidates for two seats (Chair+AltChair), this is not at all
a worry.
I see the good intention in proposing a debate about the form of the
elections, and the potentially dangerous misunderstandings, but I believe
that the best solution for the Internet Community is to give all four
candidates the possibility to run.
Let's get out from the formalities, into the debate about the ideas these
four will bring for the real voting phase, that will begin in few hours.
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|