Re: [ga] Top Level Domain Association - NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@hi-tek.com>]

I absolutely do not see any opposition in our statements and questions.  I
appreciate your point of view and believe that no real conflict exists.  The
whole concept of capture really only relates to if you agree with the
position being espoused.

I don't see a current conflict in Alternatives and others.  As a person who
generally writes policy for projects involved in marketing I see great
potential in the two working side by side for varying reasons.

Truly this disclosure has developed into great enlightenment which is
helping all of us to see that ORS are not a boogey man at all but people
just like us dotcommoners.
Ignorance and bias are our only enemies, certainly not each other.

My groups favorite saying is "Education is Marketing and Marketing is
Education."

Sincerely,

JandL wrote:

>
> Again, there is no conflict and if asked questions on a wide range of
> topics rather than focusing on one, I believe you would find that
> Patrick is not in a rut at all and the GA is not anywhere near
> capture by those who wish to have an open Internet.  If there is
> any capture, it is by a powerful minority of commercial interests.  It
> is certainly not by the general community.  We have had no voice.
>
> > I do not really see a direct conflict.  However if I understand the
> > term correctly I am watching a capture.  This seems to be the product
> > of apathy in general and great interest on the other.  I do not view
> > this as a good or bad thing, neutral. Who ever can rally the troops
> > can take control.  It would appear that the TLDA, is the one rallying
> > the troops, I guess I better go over and join so as not to be left
> > out. So then the problem is when we give Corliss over to the Council
> > to ratify as our leader but it is clear that his position came from a
> > very direct influence that is supporting a very specific agenda, must
> > they ratify him or is that a good reason to pick a person more
> > reflective of the GA which at this point is an Assembly within what
> > would seem to be a competing organization. ( a radical cybersquatter
> > cannot be a member of the IP, a non-ccTLD manager cannot be a member
> > of the ccTLD)
> >
> > These are just questions I have not developed a firm opinion on this
> > matter but feel we should address them, thanks to Danny and Corliss
> > for bringing them to the forefront.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html