<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[4]: [ga] Top Level Domain Association - NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Hello Sotiropoulos,
Saturday, March 31, 2001, 9:30:46 AM, Sotiropoulos wrote:
> William X. Walsh wrote:
>> Hello Eric,
>>
>> Saturday, March 31, 2001, 2:56:49 AM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>>
>> > I am sorry but I have not seen anything about the man JW. Where I come
> from a man
>> > who stands for nothing will fall for anything.
>>
>> Eric, if you don't know who he is, then perhaps you need to take into
>> account how new you are to the process, and that maybe you should look
>> into more than just the events in few months that the At-Large has
>> been around, which brought many "newbies" such as yourself to the process.
> William,
> Since I began my invovlement in ICANN there have been may "newbies",
> including yourself... I don't see your name on the Boston meeting List:
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/cambridge-1198/attendees.html Roberto
Attendance at physical meetings does not mean that someone was not
participating, Sotiris.
> gaetano is there and so are some of the others... but your characterization
> of Eric as a "newbie" is like the pot calling the kettle black in my
> opinion. William, in comparison to some of us you're a "newbie", but so
> what? In fact, none of the current candidates are listed for the Boston
> Meeting in '98, should we consider all of them "newbies"? Please William,
> drop the characterizations.
Sotiris, I stand by it. It was not a negative comment, and it was
accurate. It does not describe me, however. As I said, my
participation goes back many years now.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|