<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Campaigning is good; stealth is bad
My attitude is give a person enough rope to hang themselves. After all, who
will moderate the moderator after they are elected..:-)
Joanna
-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:51 PM
To: 'jo-uk@rcn.com'; ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Campaigning is good; stealth is bad
I'd like to see the candidates making statements, and responding to
inquiries about their statements. I'm not sure that equates to "unlimited
in any way". :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 6:38 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Campaigning is good; stealth is bad
Incidentally, what is the feeling of the Assembly about exceptionally
waiving the message limit for the four candidates during this week?
Yes, candidates should not be limited in any way during the next week.
Joanna
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|