[ga] Last minute changes to Verisign agreements

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I'm just printing out to read the letters. They may be in response to the NC
requested changes in what I am calling "section two" of the NC
recommendation. I don't know yet.

But, if they are in response to changes suggested to the stakeholders, or
are clarifications to Option B, couldn't that also be good news?

I need to read the letters, and am going off to do that now.



Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: JandL [mailto:jandl@jandl.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 10:28 PM
To: ga@dnso.org; david@farrar.com
Subject: Re: [ga] Last minute changes to Verisign agreements


This is a typical move for the ICANN board and Verisign.  Is there 
any way we can motion, second and present to the board?

> Most people here should have seen the announcement that despite
> explicit statements that no changes were possible to the Verisign
> agreements ("it was A or B - there is no C") ICANN management and
> Verisign have negiotated some changes which they have just announced. 
> The Board now has a full 24 hours to analyse these new agreements and
> vote on them with no input from the DNSO.
> 
> I beleive Verisign should agree to a 30 or 60 day extension to the 18
> May deadline to allow consideration of these new changes.  Yes
> Verisign said they would not agree to an extension previously but they
> also said that no further changes would be considered.
> 
> I am extremely nervous about the possibility of ICANN Board having to
> vote on such huge and critical issues with less than 24 hours to
> analyse the changes.
> 
> DPF
> 
> 
> From: icann-announce@icann.org 
> To: "ICANN Announcement List" <icann-announce@icann.org>  
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:38:02 -0700 
> Subject: [icann-announce] Proposed Revisions to ICANN-VeriSign
> Agreements 
> 
> On 1 March 2001, ICANN posted a proposal to revise the agreements
> between ICANN and VeriSign.  The announcement appears at
> <http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> >. ICANN has posted a web page, with links to relevant source
> documents and a series of FAQs about the proposal at
> <http://www.icann.org/melbourne/info-verisign-revisions.htm>.  
> 
> Among the items just posted is correspondence from yesterday and today
> between Stuart Lynn (ICANN's CEO) and Stratton Sclavos (VeriSign's
> CEO) regarding additional text changes to the proposed agreements and
> related undertakings between ICANN and VeriSign.  The URLs for this
> correspondence are:
> 
> <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/lynn-letter-to-sclavos-31mar01.ht
> m>
> <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/sclavos-letter-to-lynn-01apr01.ht
> m>
> <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/lynn-letter-to-sclavos-01apr01.ht
> m>
> 
>                                   ###
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html