Re: [ga] Last minute changes to Verisign agreements

[Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>]

Dave Crocker wrote:

Your statement is directly in line with the many other participants who are more
concerned about the precise details of process than they are about making real
progress, never mind doing it is a timely fashion.

>
> Such a casual attitude towards the content of proposals suggests a lack of
> real concern about the content of ICANN's work and, by implication, a
> disregard for the real work of administering names and addresses on the net.
>
> Let's stop treating this as an academic exercise in abstract governance and
> treat it more like the pragmatic task of operations administration that it is.
>
> d/

I definately hope this was tongue in cheek, because it is almost word for word,
the justification for the group that started WWII  Someone correct me if I am
wrong.  And I fall all over myself saying I am sorry ahead of time. But Whoa we do
not do away with process to placate dollar people.  This is not OK.

Sincerely,

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html