ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] serious participation in ICANN processes


At 08:14 AM 4/2/2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >Here, though, the negotiated deal violates policy by scrapping the 
> separation
> >of registry and registrar.
>
>1) There is no such policy.
>
>
> >I do not think board and staff have the authority
> >to do that without DNSO approval.
>
>In fact, the board has the legal, moral, and and ethical DUTY to act
>without DNSO approval, if they find it is in the best interests of the
>Internet.  This is clearly spelled out in the Bylaws.


These two items demonstrate the pervasive tendency to debate about 
theoretical issues that have no factual basis in ICANN legal documents.

As people claim to be serious participants, they should consider the 
responsibility that participation carries, to be adequately educated about 
the relevant fact, not theory.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>