RE: [ga] ICANN benefits

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>-No policing by ICANN of the supplemental rules instituted by the providers
>to ensure they mesh with the ICANN rules (for instance see
>http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/95344.htm)

The decision for that case, and that case alone, should have been enough
proof of the stupidity of the current system to have the UDRP frozen and no
more cases heard until it was repaired.

Digusting.

How to steal a domain name using the UDRP.

Publish a magazine using that domain name (that you don't and have never
owned) on the masthead, then claim "consumer confusion" and get some Arb
Forum "arbitrators" to give you the name.

What a sham.

And still it continues.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html