Re[2]: [ga] ICANN benefits

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Kent,

Saturday, April 07, 2001, 12:03:33 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
> I view "burden of proof" as an objective matter of procedure, and
> largely independent of assumptions about "fundamental rights".  The
> system is an arbitration system, for resolving disputes.  The
> complainant must make a showing of (as I recall) that three basic
> conditions exist; the respondent will contest those.  But an arbitrator
> could throw out a complainants case simply on the grounds that the
> complainant had not established that the three conditions exist. 

Provided, of course, that they didn't have an incentive to rule for
plaintiffs built into the system.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html