Re: [ga] ICANN benefits

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 15:42 7/04/01 -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:

>Crocker: 
>> > > As has been noted frequently, the UDRP needs enhancement.  But let's
not
>> > > attribute more precedent to it or ICANN than is valid.
>> >
>Me:
>> > Specifically, it needs better protection for the domain holders who are
>> > attacked using it.

The enhancement, in the form of protection for the Domain Name Owner, lies
in the formulation (by ICANN's DNSO?)  of a DN Owners' "Bill of Rights",
that should be part of the preamble of UDRP rules and all registrar
contracts that refer to them.

(I remember raising this point almost 3 years ago)


--Joop--
Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
Developer of    The Polling Booth
www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html