RE: Re[2]: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes

[Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>]

At 02:21 AM 4/9/2001, Dassa wrote:
>This is one area that the UDRP really disappoints me.  It should be a 
>mechanism
>to a handle ALL domain disputes and not just trademark issues.

It is important to crawl before walking.  The UDRP is rather experimental, 
given its global implication.  Hence it is important to start with the 
narrowest mechanism possible, to limit the damage if there are serious 
problems.  (Please see your previous postings for examples of such concerns.)

There were attempts to expand the scope of the UDRP but they were -- very 
wisely -- resisted.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html