Re: [ga] No Members?

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

You make the assumption that the BoD and staff wanted to have elections.  Look at
it the otherway and it is a dismal failure.

Sincerely,

Sotiris wrote:

> Andrew and Joanna,
>
> As I recall the numbers, there were over 170, 000 or so applications for
> membership, of which some 70,000 or so were actually issued PINs for voting.
> I'd say only 10,000 or so returned envelopes is a resounding success!  Wouldn't
> both of you?
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>         Individual
>
> Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> > Andrew McLaughlin wrote Monday, April 09, 2001 10:54 PM
> > You're right -- we have been discussing this since the At Large process last
> > year.  As the posted statistics make clear
> > <http://www.atlargestudy.org/stats/summary1.shtml>, ICANN received 10,334
> > returned letters.   As you note, we have also discussed this problem on the
> > icann-eu list.
> >
> > Hello Andrew,
> > Thank you for the clarification about boxes and boxes of @Large membership
> > verification returned to ICANN. I am not subscribed to icann-eu myself and
> > therefore did not know about discussions to which you refer. Is there a
> > public archive that I may review?.  As an EU citizen residing in the USA, I
> > am most interested in both perspectives.
> > Regards,
> > Joanna
> >
> >

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html