Re: [ga] Question No. 1

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@hi-tek.com>]

It is this simple Mr. Crocker: If your position here is correct then the DoC has
nothing to contract with ICANN about.  If this is true the subject of the
contract is not a valid one, and therefor the contract is void or voidable at
least.

Sincerely,

Dave Crocker wrote:

> At 10:14 AM 4/11/2001, Bruce James wrote:
> >Everyone and no one has a claim. But the USG thinks it does!
>
> There are some Congress-folk who either do not understand the global nature
> of the DNS, or worse, believe that the US Gov't really does "own" the thing.
>
> However the reasoned, responsible view is that the US Gov't is providing
> stewardship and oversight for a process that is moving the DNS (and IP)
> administrative structure into a long-term, non-governmental framework.
>
> d/
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html