Re: [ga] Question No. 1

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

On Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:56 AM (AEST)
Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
Subject: Re: [ga] Question No. 1


> Excellent comparison.  It highlights fundamental misunderstandings about
> domain names:
>
>          Children's names are assumed NOT to be unique.
>          Domain names MUST be unique.
>
> Hence domain name assignment requires a mechanism for ensuring uniqueness.

Hi Dave

You logic never makes sense.  IF domain names MUST be unique then you CANNOT
have two domain names with the same extension like crocker.biz.

Which means that alternate TLDs either (a) don't exist or (b) are not a problem.

IF domain name assignment MUST have a mechanism for ensuring uniqueness then one
MUST already exist (that's if domain names MUST be unique in the first place).

Of course, if there is such a mechanism it is singularly ineffective.

Regards
Patrick Corliss



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html