<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Re[2]: [ga] collisions in namespace (was gTLD Constituency)
As a remote participant, I was witness to proceedings in Melbourne through
the Berkman Centre connection. Christopher Ambler's version of events
surrounding the IOD decision represents what I remember accurately.
Sincerely,
Joanna
on 4/12/01 8:51 PM, Christopher Ambler at cambler-dompol@iodesign.com wrote:
>> ONE director (Hans K.) stated that that would be a good reason to award it
>> to Afilias anyway, Vint Cerf had reservations, it was debated briefly and
>> the majority of the Board decided to back away from such a confrontational
>> decision.
>
> That same director was dead-set against IOD in part because it proposed
> to be both registry and registrar. Even after pledging to accept registrars
> immediately, that director said that being both a registry and a registrar
> "[went] against everything we've worked for" over the past 2 years.
>
> That same director then voted for the new Verisign contracts, making
> them both registry and registrar for .com forever.
>
> Hello?
>
> Christopher
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|